What is the problem with using MARR_TYPE?
(See attached.)
I suspect you are going to say “but it doesn’t include “Common law marriage”. 🙂
There are three options for that:
1 – You could decide to use one of the existing types as a proxy. Perhaps “Registered partnership”.
2 – You could use an existing type and add a custom translation to change it to “Common law marriage”
3 -You could ask me to add “Common law marriage” as a new option in that list. (I’d rather do that than see you use _COML)