The latest release, kiwitrees 3.2.2 is now available for download here. There are a couple of changes to be aware of that are described below, but overall this is just a maintenance release.
[h2 class=”hue”]Background [/h2]
When the original version of PhpGedView (PGV) was released in 2001 internet browsers were relatively basic compared to today’s standards. So it was common to use pop-up overlay screens for functions such as edit windows. PGV’s were commonly about 500 px wide by 600 px tall and positioned somewhere near the centre of the browser screen. They were, in most browsers, the only way to have both your original data and the edit window open at the same time easily. However their small size meant many compromises to the content display, and as laptop computers and more recently tablets and smart phones became popular they occupied more of the available screen.
The design stayed relatively untouched through the 2010 move to webtrees (and is still used there today), and on to kiwitrees – until now! In the latest release of kiwitrees (v.3.2.0, 1st March 2016) the pop-ups have been replaced, making full use of the now universal “tabbed” browsers.
[h2 class=”hue”]The future[/h2]
Now, when you click “edit” on any record, fact, or event you will open a new tab in your browser. It still contains the same data entry fields as before, but by having more available space it is easier to read, requires less scrolling and can, at least on most desktop computers, display all available options at once (no scrolling down to find things you didn’t know existed). On smaller devices it will automatically adjust to make best use of the available width, pushing some elements down lower. But still keeping texts and entry fields large enough to see and access easily.
If, as part of the edit, you need to add something (new source, media object, or shared note) clicking on those features will open a third new tab, similarly designed for ease of use.[testimonial6 author=”Admin” company=”Kiwitrees.net” imageurl=”https://kiwitrees.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/kiwi-64×64.png”]
Regardless of the browser, using tabs the majority make it possible to:
- Reduce scrolling
- Have less cluttered screens
- Make all options immediately visible
- Work better on small devices
- Switch from tab to tab easily (no possibility of a tab disappearing completely behind the browser window as pop=ups coulld and frequently did)
- Drag tabs completely out of the current browser window to create a second browser window (except on most tablets / smartphones). This allows you to re-size and move tabs independently (just as you could pop-ups) and ‘dock’ them to either side of the screen so you can see both side-by-side.
As described, and shown in the image above this post, the better use of available space is one of the greatest benefits. This is particularly the case in the most complex of the old pop-ups – the Census Assistant window. Here you can see the old and new for comparison:
In my inbox this morning I found this offer and announcement from the British Newspaper Archive (a subsidiary of Find My past) about the 1939 Register
*** LATEST NEWS – 28 Jan 2016 8:00am (NZT)***
This brief announcement, not repeated as far as I can see on any FMP web site or social media, tells us a number of important things:
- FMP are about to increase (all?) their prices. 🙁
- You can reduce the impact of that temporarily by using this 10% discount offer 🙂
- You’ve only got about two days to do so 🙁
- FMP are including the 1939 Register in their World and Britain subscriptions from February 16th 🙂
This last point (4) is by far the most interesting, but can be read in a number of different ways.
We could simply be grateful. It is after all what the majority (as far as I can tell) of people have been demanding since the 1939 was released in November.
But many of us will be annoyed that so soon after emphatically repeating that it was NOT going to be included in subscriptions they have again demonstrated poor communication skills (to be generous!). The phrase “milked for all they are worth” comes to mind and doesn’t leave me feeling good about FMP.
I’m sure we will all wonder WHY? Has the initial uptake and payments been so great that they have already covered their initial investment? Or has it been so poor, and caused so many people to cancel or (like me) not renew their subscription that an urgent and desperate u-turn is necessary?
I guess based on previous experiences we will never know. We must all simply make our own decisions on whether to take up the opportunity or not.
For myself, I decided weeks ago that for all but my closest ancestors “unlocking the household” simply wasn’t worth the expense. I discovered nothing new in 99.9% of cases. I have however found a number of new pieces of information from the freely available data, and will continue to do the same. I generally do not find FMPs other data sets of any great use over and above the alternatives I already subscribe to.